![]() ![]() So in order to test whether you are playing natively or using Flash, you would need to disable that.īut back to Firefox. ''Because every video works in Chrome with html5.''Ĭhrome includes an integrated Flash player. See this support article from Adobe under the heading "Last Resort": Adobe Forums: How do I troubleshoot Flash Player's protected mode for Firefox? See this support article from Adobe under the heading "Last Resort": Adobe Forums: How do I troubleshoot Flash Player's protected mode for Firefox? Read this answer in context □ 2 All Replies (10) (2) Disable protected mode (Win Vista & Win 7 & maybe Win 8) (B) In Flash, see this support article from Adobe: Orange Firefox button or classic Tools menu > Options > Advanced > General > "Use hardware acceleration when available" (A) In Firefox, un-check the box here and restart: (1) Disable hardware graphics acceleration in Firefox and in Flash I think there has been some movement on that, at least in the mobile space, but I haven't looked into it recently.īut back to Firefox. They add features to Firefox to make browsing faster, safer, or just plain fun. Get the extension Extensions are like apps for Firefox. Adobe Flash Player plug-in - Google Chrome Help.Ĭhrome might natively play more videos, because for a long time, Firefox has not played H.264-encoded videos due to patent issues. Remove related and recommended video suggestions, comments & more. ![]() So in order to test whether you are playing natively or using Flash, you would need to disable that. But if you want an up-to-date, fully portable 64-bit browser, Waterfox Portable is the obvious choice.Because every video works in Chrome with html5.Ĭhrome includes an integrated Flash player. Of course, all the major Web browsers perform quite well in most conditions we suggest trying each of them since they're all free. But both Waterfox versions seemed fast and stable in actual browsing. The installed Waterfox clearly bested the portable version, which has been our experience with portable browsers. Both the installed and portable versions of Waterfox loaded quickly and were very similar to the others in performance, though none dethroned the reigning speed champ, Chrome. We ran numerous bandwidth speed tests on Waterfox Portable, the installed Waterfox, Firefox 18, Internet Explorer 9 32-bit and 64-bit, Opera, and Google Chrome. Other than that, Waterfox looks and behaves exactly like what it is, Firefox with some fancy tuning under the hood. If you open Waterfox and then open Firefox, the pages will open in Waterfox, and vice versa: If we had Firefox open, clicking the Waterfox icon opened a new page in Firefox (which is why we tried Waterfox with and without Firefox installed). Waterfox automatically imported our user data from our existing Firefox installation. The biggest difference most users will see between Firefox and Waterfox (installed or portable) is the deep-blue Waterfox Start button and blue logo. We also tried Waterfox Portable with and without standard Firefox installed. We pitted it against top-ranked browsers in two separate 64-bit Windows installations, Home Premium and Ultimate. The 64-bit Waterfox is also available in a fully portable version for users who prefer portable programs or who want a portable 64-bit Web browser for their USB drive. Of course, while your Internet connection's speed and reliability will have a much greater impact on your day-to-day browsing speed than your browser will, a 64-bit browser offers some advantages in 64-bit Windows, such as increased speed and improved stress handling. Waterfox takes advantage of a variety of speed-boosting technologies found in most current Intel CPUs and the latest AMD processors, too, such as SSE3, AVX, and Jemalloc. Many different Web browsers are built on Mozilla's open-source Firefox project, including Waterfox, a 64-bit version of Firefox. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |